Canola
E. S. Oplinger1, L. L. Hardman2, E. T. Gritton1,
J. D. Doll1, and K. A. Kelling2
1Departments of Agronomy and Soil Science, College of Agricultural and
Life Sciences and Cooperative Extension Service, University of Wisconsin-Madison,
WI 53706.
2Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota,
St. Paul, MN 55108.
November, 1989.
I. History:
Canola is a name applied to edible oilseed rape. This plant belongs to the mustard
family along with 3,000 other species. Close relatives of this crop have been cultivated
for food since the earliest recordings of man. Rapeseed has been important to Europe
since the 13th century as a source of food and oil for fuel. Rapeseed production
became popular in North America during World War II as a source of lubricants. Its
oil has the property of adhering well to moist metal, making it an ideal lubricant
for marine engines.
The name "canola" was registered in 1979 by the Western Canadian Oilseed Crushers
Association to describe "double-low" varieties. Double low indicates that the processed
oil contains less than 2% erucic acid and the meal less than 3 mg/g of glucosinolates.
Erucic acid is a fatty acid that has been related to heart disease. Glucosinolates
have breakdown products that are toxic to animals. Both characteristics make rapeseed
products poor candidates for animal consumption.
In the early 1960s, Canadian plant breeders isolated single lines free of erucic
acid and began programs to develop double low varieties.
Today annual worldwide production of canola is approximately 7.5 million tons on
4 million acres. Canada accounts for 15% of the world production and the European
Economic Community for nearly 17%. The United States produces less than 1% of the
world production. Minnesota and North Dakota are the major U.S. production states
with about 20,000 acres. Canola ranks 5th in production among the world's oilseed
crops following soybeans, sunflowers, peanuts and cottonseed.
II. Uses:
A. Oil and Protein:
Like soybean, canola contains both high oil content as well as high protein content.
It contains about 40% oil and 23% protein compared to 20 and 40%, respectively,
for soybean. Like soybean, when the oil is crushed out, it leaves a high quality,
high protein (37%) feed concentrate which is highly palatable to livestock. Commercial
varieties of canola were developed from two species; Brassica napus (Argentine
type) and Brassica campestris (Polish type). Both species of canola produce
seed that is high in polyunsaturated fatty acids (oleic, linoleic, and linolenic).
B. Forages:
Another potential for canola is as an annual forage. Historically, it was used as
a forage for field-raised swine and poultry. Canola can produce 1.0 to 2.0 tons
of dry matter per acre in a single season. A study conducted in Kansas found winter
rapeseed forage to have crude protein of 21-33%, compared to 24% for winter wheat
foliage.
III. Growth Habits:
Both fall and spring seeded types of canola are available. Canola growth is characterized
by six main growth stages. Much of the management of this crop is related to the
length of time and plant characteristics within each of these stages. Stage 0 is
preemergence. The germinating seedling may take from 4 to 10 days to emerge. During
this time it is susceptible to many soil borne pathogens. In Canada, seed protectant
fungicides are often used on spring types, however effective materials have not
been registered for use in the U.S. Speed of emergence depends on soil temperature
and moisture, seed soil contact, and depth of planting. Stage 1 is the seedling
stage where the very young plant has just emerged from the soil. Cotyledons are
pushed through the soil surface by an active hypocotyl. At this stage, the seedling
is still vulnerable to many soil pathogens, and to flea beetle infestation. Both
pests are detrimental to stand establishment. Since the early canola crop is a poor
competitor, it is extremely important to get a good stand.
Stage 2 is the rosette stage characterized by an increasing leaf area index. Spring
canola will remain in this vegetative stage for several weeks. Winter canola also
stays in this stage for several weeks in the spring. Near the end of Stage 2, the
crop is nearing its maximum leaf area index and at that point is a much better competitor.
Increasing day length and temperatures initiate bolting and the beginning of Stage
3, the bud stage. The plants reach their maximum leaf area index at this time along
with 30 to 60% of its total dry matter. A large accumulation of foliage is required
to provide adequate sugars during flowering and pod fill.
Flowering begins Stage 4 and continues for 14 to 21 days. Three to five flowers
open per day and 40 to 55% of the flowers that open will develop pods. Ripening,
or Stage 5, begins when the petals fall from the last formed flower on the main
stem. Pod fill is complete 35 to 45 days after flower initiation, and the seeds
contain about 40% moisture at this point. The crop is considered ripe and ready
for swathing when 30 to 40% of the seed from pods on the main stem have turned color.
Spring varieties of B. napus mature 74 to 140 days after seeding and B. campestris
in 66 to 111 days.
IV. Environment Requirements:
A. Climate:
Canola is widely adapted, particularly to the cool extremes of the temperate zones.
Minimum temperatures for growth have been reported to be near 32oF. The
crop will germinate and emerge with soil temperatures at 41oF but the
optimum is 50oF. Winter annual varieties are grown where adequate snow
covers or mild winters are common. The crop has been produced successfully in Michigan
without benefit of snow cover. Planting date has a dramatic effect on survival however.
B. Soil:
Canola does best on medium textured, well drained soils. The crop is tolerant of
a soil pH as low as 5.5 and saline conditions. Because of its tolerance to salinity,
canola has been used as the first crop on newly drained dikes in the Netherlands.
Canola requires approximately 16 to 18 inches of water through its growing season,
with 8 to 8.3 inches used by annual varieties in July near flower and pod fill.
V. Cultural Practices:
A. Seedbed Preparation:
Stand establishment is very important with canola because of its lack of early competitiveness.
Seeding into a smooth, firm seedbed helps maintain a uniform seeding depth and even
emergence. Seedbed preparation is usually done with a shallow (4-5 inch) tillage
operation. Recent research, however, has shown some success establishing canola
with reduced tillage.
B. Seeding Date:
Canola can be seeded in either the fall or the spring depending on the type of variety.
Fall dates need to be timed to achieve about 6 true leaves and good root reserves
before a killing frost. Planting between August 15 and September 1 should accomplish
this in most areas of Wisconsin and Minnesota. Spring planting should begin as early
as soil is dry and weather permits. Like spring small grains, spring canola generally
yields the best with early planting. At Arlington, WI canola seeded the last week
of April averaged 1325 lb/a compared to 1150 lb/a when seeded three weeks later
on May 20.
C. Method and Rate of Seeding:
Canola is usually seeded with the small seed attachment of a grain drill to a depth
of 1/2 to 1 inch. Rows should be spaced 7 inches or less. Research has shown highest
yields with 3-inch row spacings. Canola should be seeded at 4-5 lb/a if drilled
and 7-8 lb/a if broadcast depending on seed size and soil texture. Stands should
be around 6-8 plants per square foot for highest yields. Canola stands of this density
can withstand up to a 2/3 kill before reseeding is more profitable than maintaining
the existing crop.
D. Fertility and Lime Requirements:
Little information is available on the responsiveness of canola to lime applications
or soil pH. Most current canola production areas tend to be on soils which are slightly
acid to alkaline, however this does not mean that more acid soils necessarily need
to be limed to these levels.
Some states recommend that P and K should be applied on the basis of soil test recommendations
for winter wheat. Table 1 shows the nutrient removals for typical wheat, barley
and canola yields. For Wisconsin and Minnesota this means that when soil tests are
in the medium range about 20-30 lbs of P2O5 and 20 lbs of
K2O should be applied per acre. At lower soil tests these rates should
be increased. Because canola is sensitive to direct seed contact with fertilizer,
applications should be banded at least 2 inches to the side and below the seed or
broadcast.
Table 1. Spring canola vs. other crops in usage of various macro nutrients.
|
|
|
Nutrients Removed (lbs./A)
|
|
|
N
|
P
|
K
|
S
|
Wheat at 40 bu./A
|
Seed
|
60
|
24
|
16
|
4
|
|
Straw
|
25
|
5
|
48
|
6
|
|
Total
|
85
|
29
|
64
|
10
|
Barley at 60 bu./A
|
Seed
|
60
|
22
|
20
|
5
|
|
Straw
|
30
|
8
|
67
|
6
|
|
Total
|
90
|
30
|
87
|
11
|
Canola at 35 bu./A
|
Seed
|
66
|
32
|
16
|
12
|
|
Straw
|
39
|
14
|
67
|
9
|
|
Total
|
105
|
46
|
83
|
21
|
Canola responds well to nitrogen fertilizer, with optimum yields occurring around
80-100 lbs N/acre. For spring canola, it should be broadcast and incorporated at
seeding time along with the P and K. For winter canola, nitrogen may be best applied
as a split application using starter nitrogen application of about 10-20 lbs/acre,
followed by the remainder in the spring prior to regrowth.
As shown in Table 1, canola is a heavy user of sulfur. Soils most likely to respond
to S additions are light colored, sandy soils, in northwestern Wisconsin and northern
Minnesota which have not been manured within the past two years.
E. Variety Selection:
There are several varieties of oilseed rape available particularly from Canadian
sources. Recently released varieties which meet the qualifications to be called
canola are:
Andor - Released by University of Alberta in 1981 with distribution rights
to Can-Alta Seeds Ltd., Red Deer, Alberta.
Global - Developed by Svalof A. B., Plant Breeding Station, Sweden. Distributed
by Bonis and Company Ltd., Lindsay, Ontario, Canada.
Hyola - Hybrid developed by Contiseed Ltd. (Canada) to be marketed in U.S.
in 1988, by Contiseed, Huron, SD.
Triton - Tolerant of triazine (Sencor, Lexone, atrazine, etc.) herbicides.
Originated by University of Guelph, Ontario. Licensed in 1984.
Regent - Originated by University of Manitoba. Licensed in 1977.
Topas - Reported to have moderate resistance to Sclerotinia. Developed by
Svalof A. B., Plant Breeding Station, Sweden. Distributed by Bonis and Company Ltd.,
Lindsay, Ontario, Canada.
Tower - Originated by University of Manitoba. Licensed in 1974.
Tribute - Tolerant of triazine herbicides (Sencor, Lexone, atrazine, etc.).
Better oil quality than OAC Triton but much lower seed yield than Westar. Originated
by Agriculture Canada, Saskatoon, and University of Guelph, Ontario. Licensed in
1985.
Westar - Originated by Agriculture Canada, Saskatoon. Licensed in 1982. Production
of certified seed limited to Canada.
Candle - Originated by Agriculture Canada, Saskatoon. Licensed in 1977.
Tobin - Originated by Agriculture Canada, Saskatoon. Licensed in 1981. Production
of certified seed limited to Canada.
Characteristics of spring seeded canola varieties in Minnesota tests are shown in
Table 2. (from Varietal Trials of Farm Crops - Minnesota Report 24)
Table 2. Characteristics of spring canola in Minnesota.
|
|
|
|
|
Planting to
|
|
|
Crop and Variety
|
Oil
|
Test Weight
|
Seeds
|
Bloom
|
Maturity
|
Lodging
|
Height
|
|
%
|
Lbs./bu.
|
1,000/lb
|
------ days -----
|
Score
|
Inches
|
Brassica napus
|
Andor
|
42
|
50
|
137
|
51
|
98
|
0.9
|
35
|
Hyola 70
|
40
|
43
|
250
|
55
|
88
|
1.1
|
34
|
Global
|
41
|
51
|
133
|
59
|
99
|
2.2
|
39
|
OAC Triton
|
41
|
51
|
116
|
56
|
100
|
2.1
|
30
|
Topas
|
43
|
51
|
156
|
58
|
98
|
1.2
|
39
|
Tribute
|
35
|
49
|
152
|
55
|
88
|
0.8
|
31
|
Westar
|
42
|
51
|
123
|
52
|
93
|
0.9
|
35
|
Brassica campestris
|
Tobin
|
41
|
52
|
197
|
43
|
89
|
4.0
|
30
|
F. Weed Control:
The best weed control practices are tillage, establishment of a good stand, and
weed control in previous crops. Cruciferous weeds (wild radish, wild mustard, pennycress
and shepherd's purse) are nearly impossible to control in the crop.
1. Cultural. As with small grains, the weed control in canola is primarily from
the crop itself. Follow all recommended cultural practices to assure a dense vigorous
crop that competes well with weeds. Select fields with minimal weed pressure and
try to avoid those with weeds in the mustard family.
2. Mechanical control measures cannot be used in canola. A rotary hoe would kill
many crop plants and row cultivation is not feasible because of the narrow row spacing.
3. Chemical. Treflan is the only herbicide registered in the United states for use
in canola. Treflan and Poast are registered in Canada. Treflan is applied preplant
incorporated and gives good annual grass control, but misses ragweed, mustard, and
lady's thumb smartweed. Poast is used for postemergence control of annual grasses,
quackgrass and volunteer cereals.
G. Diseases and their Control:
White mold (Sclerotinia stem rot) can be a serious disease after flowering
in seasons with cool, moist growing conditions. Infection occurs when dropped petals
contact the stem and spores germinate on the dead petals. Bleached stem lesions
occur around the initial infection, then white mold and black fungal bodies grow
inside and outside the stem. Sudden wilting and premature dying of individual plants
are usually the first noticeable symptoms. Since white mold is a problem in several
other crops, its occurrence in canola must be carefully monitored. Avoid planting
canola following such crops as soybeans and dry edible beans or sunflower.
H. Insects and Other Predators and their Control:
Many insects may infest canola at various stages of its growth. Probably the greatest
problem is caused by the flea beetle, a shiny black beetle about 10 to 15 mm long
which attacks canola particularly at emergence, although it can be a problem later
as well. Hot, sunny weather promotes feeding damage. Most growers control flea beetles
with a granular insecticide mixed with the seed, but other seed-applied formulations
and postemergence insecticides are also available. Seed-applied insecticides provide
protection for about half as long as the granular materials. Flea beetle has not
been a problem with winter canola types.
Diamondback moth larvae can be a problem in dry years. The larvae are pale yellow
to light green, 11 to 13 mm in length, and frequently hang by a spun thread. Larvae
eat flowers and young pods, and peel older tissue. Seeds under peeled pods often
fail to develop properly. Spraying with one of the recommended insecticides can
be justified in situations where there are over 20 larvae per plant.
I. Harvesting:
Timely harvest of canola is critical to prevent shattering. When pods first begin
to yellow, the crop needs to be checked on a 3 to 4 day schedule. Harvest maturity
can only be determined by observing the color of the seed. In canola that stands
well, 30 to 40% of the seed on the main stem needs to be brownish-red in color prior
to swathing. This corresponds to about 30 to 35% seed moisture. Canola does have
a tendency to lodge, particularly with over-fertilization of susceptible varieties.
In severely lodged canola, swathing should be done when 40 to 50% of the seed in
exposed pods has turned color.
Shattering can account for significant crop losses, therefore harvesting must not
be delayed. Canola should be cut high on the stem and lightly pushed into the stubble
with a windrower to prevent blowing. The crop is combined when it has dried to near
10% moisture. Direct combining with the use of a desiccant is possible in canola
that is standing well, but determining application time is difficult and field losses
are higher. The cylinder speed should be set at 450-1000 RPM and the cylinder concave
clearance at 3/16 to 1/2 inch. Losses should be evaluated for further refinement
of these adjustments. Canola that is to be stored for six months or more must be
dried to near 8% moisture.
J. Drying and Storage:
Rapeseed must be handled and stored carefully. Tight storage bins are required.
Seed can sweat in storage even at 9 to 20% moisture content. Inspection is required
to prevent heating and spoilage in the bin. The small seed restricts air flow, so
thin layers are necessary for drying wet seed. If much straw is present a scalper
should be used to clean the crop.
VI. Yield Potential and Performance Results:
Yields of canola in the upper Midwest have been extremely variable in recent studies.
In Minnesota, yields have ranged from 150 to 2500 lb/a with oil ranging from 39
to 47%. A test weight of 52 lb/bu is generally used for canola.
Studies conducted at several locations in Wisconsin have found yields of spring
types ranging from 250 to 2300 lb/a, while winter types frequently have not survived
the Wisconsin winters. Recent Wisconsin yields are summarized in Table 3 and Minnesota
yields in Table 4.
Table 3. Yield of spring and fall seeded canola varieties in Wisconsin.
|
Variety
|
Arlington
|
Marshfield
|
Hancock
|
Ashland
|
Spooner
|
Sturgeon Bay
|
Spring Seeded
|
Years:
|
1985-87
|
1985
|
1985
|
1985-86
|
1985
|
1985-86
|
No. tests:
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
|
---------------------------- yield (lb/a)--------------------------
|
Varieties
|
Westar
|
1485
|
1248
|
1577
|
826
|
1731
|
1846
|
Topas
|
1099
|
1248
|
2096
|
1111
|
2269
|
1849
|
Global
|
1243
|
1549
|
2201
|
970
|
1993
|
1848
|
Fall Seeded
|
Years:
|
1986
|
1986
|
1986
|
1986
|
|
1986-87
|
No. tests:
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
Variety
|
Jupiter
|
1422
|
645
|
938
|
1325
|
|
1746
|
Table 4. Seed yield of spring canola in Minnesota.
|
Crop and Variety
|
Roseau
1981,82,84-85
|
Crookston
1985
|
Rosemont
1979-83, 87
|
Waseca
1987-88
|
Lamberton
1987
|
Grand Rapids
1988
|
|
----------------------------- lbs/A -------------------------------
|
Brassica napus
|
Andor
|
17743
|
1507
|
12293
|
302
|
693
|
1010
|
Hyola 70
|
--
|
--
|
5691
|
151
|
1087
|
595
|
Global
|
25051
|
1051
|
5181
|
188
|
665
|
1063
|
OAC Triton
|
14152
|
954
|
5931
|
179
|
510
|
208
|
Topas
|
16511
|
1058
|
6121
|
129
|
604
|
996
|
Tribute
|
--
|
--
|
4271
|
211
|
536
|
769
|
Westar
|
23592
|
1377
|
6342
|
281
|
1220
|
1285
|
Brassica campestris
|
Tobin
|
11453
|
876
|
11613
|
273
|
920
|
697
|
1One year data, 2Two year data, 3Three year data
|
VII. Economics of Production and Markets:
Canola is sometimes marketed on a contract basis. No standard grading system exists
in the U.S., (although standards are being developed and may be in place by 1990),
but primary grades used in Canada are generally followed by buyers.
Table 5 compares the costs of producing soybean, another oilseed crop, and those
of canola. "Fixed costs" assume that such things as equipment, time investment,
interest rates, etc. are the same for both crops. However, even with these costs
being equal, the direct costs of canola production are higher. Most of the additional
expense comes from increased fertilizer and pesticide
inputs. Transportation costs to the market have not been included. For most areas
of Wisconsin and Minnesota these costs are likely to be much higher for canola than
for soybean considering the lack of available canola markets.
Table 5. Canola production costs compared to soybean.
|
|
Cost/Acre
|
Expense
|
Soybean
|
Canola
|
Fixed costs
|
152.00
|
152.00
|
Variable costs
|
|
|
Seed
|
$15,00
|
$14.00
|
Inoculum
|
0.50
|
0.00
|
Fertilizer
|
16.80
|
34.00
|
Herbicide
|
15.00
|
6.00
|
Insecticide
|
0.00
|
1.50
|
Subtotal
|
$47.30
|
$55.50
|
Total Cost
|
$199.30
|
$207.50
|
Potential returns of canola at $.10/lb with those of soybean at $5.50/bu are compared
in Table 6. From this information, it is apparent that canola must yield higher
than any of the varieties have in the recent Minnesota and Wisconsin evaluations
to be economical.
Table 6. Potential returns with soybean at $5.50 per bushel and
canola at $0.10 per pound.
|
Production level
|
Soybean Yield
(bu./A)
|
Profit
|
Canola Yield
(lbs./A)
|
Profit
|
Breakeven
|
36
|
$ 0.00
|
2,075
|
$ 0.00
|
Good Yield
|
50
|
75.70
|
2,800
|
72.70
|
High Yield
|
70
|
185.70
|
3,600
|
152.50
|
Canola may be more adapted and competitive in the extreme northern portion of the
Midwest where soybean yields are lower. With proper management, canola may be a
potentially profitable crop for these areas.
VIII. Information Sources:
Canola Production Handbook. 1989. Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin, C-706.
Kansas State University. Manhattan, KS.
Canola Characteristics and Production. 1986. B. D. Philbrook. Agron. Seminar Memo.
Dept. of Agronomy - U.W. Madison.
Will Canola take Root in Michigan? 1987. L. O. Copeland. Crops and Soils Newsletter.
Michigan State Univ., E. Lansing, MI.
Winter Rapeseed Cultural Information. 1986. L. L. Hardman. Dept. of Agronomy &
Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minn. St. Paul, MN.
Varietal trials of Farm Crops. Minnesota Report 24. Univ. of Minn. Ag. Exp. Sta.,
St. Paul, MN.
References to pesticide products in this publication are for your convenience and
are not an endorsement of one product over other similar products. You are responsible
for using pesticides according to the manufacturer's current label directions.
Follow directions exactly to protect the environment and people from pesticide exposure.
Failure to do so violates the law.
Footnotes:
1 Canola is sensitive to high temperatures, especially during flowering.
Yields decline from northern to southern Minnesota, largely due to heat stress.
2 In Minnesota, fall seeding should take place between Aug. 1 and Sept.
20. Winterkill of fall-seeded canola is likely if there is insufficient snow cover.
(In 1989, 5 of 6 locations of winter canola were winterkilled).
3 Check with authorities about temporary labels for your state, as there
are currently no insecticides for canola that have a national EPA label.